Why the first Godfather was better than the second

This is going to be a short post, but I will explain to you why the first Godfather was better than the second Godfather II.  Now the obvious explanation is that the second is too long and it is really two movies in one – that is, the story of Michael Corleone and Heiman Roth and the back story of Don Corleone.  NO, that is not the reason although it is two movies and it would have been better if the director had split it into a sequel and a prequel.

The real reason is that Michael Corleone is in no way LIKABLE.  Everything about Michael is horrible.  Maybe it is because Brando was a better actor than Pacino, but you could always sympathize with Don Corleone (Brando).  Michael Corleone is a sociopath and perhaps Pacino is a worse actor, but nothing about Michael is redeemable.  He is an awful human being and it is not possible for part 2 to ever measure up to the first because of this.

Take away – if you prefer Part II…you are a flawed human being.  If you prefer the original…keep doing what you are doing.

Good night and God bless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s